On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 1:14 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 5:55 AM, Pavel Golub <pa...@microolap.com> wrote: >> DP> The new status of this patch is: Ready for Committer >> >> Seems like, we may also going to hit it and it would be cool this >> vacuum issue solved for next PG version. > > Exactly which patch on this thread is someone proposing for commit? >
I guess that is the patch I proposed. However I think that there still is room for discussion because the patch cannot skip to cleanup vacuum when aggressive vacuum, which is one of the situation that I really wanted to skip. Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
