Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 4:53 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org>
> wrote:
>> My view is that the fact that partitioning uses inheritance is just an
>> implementation detail. We shouldn't let historical behavior for
>> inheritance dictate behavior for partitioning. Inheritance has many
>> undesirable warts.
> I don't think it's a good idea for table partitioning and table
> inheritance to behave differently.
I'm with Robert on this one. I'd be in favor of changing both cases
to make ALTER OWNER recurse by default.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
