On 23 October 2017 at 05:44, Eric Ridge <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Oct 22, 2017, at 3:24 PM, Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Again, you'll probably need to put this low level requirement into >> context if you want sound advice from this list. > > I'm just thinking out lout here, but the context is likely something along > the lines of externally storing all transaction ids, and periodically asking > Postgres if they're known-to-be-aborted-by-all-transactions -- one at a time. I think Peter is asking "why?". -- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
