On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 7:24 PM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki <tsunakawa.ta...@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: > (3) > Should we change the default value of max_wal_size from 1 GB to a smaller > size? I vote for "no" for performance.
The default has just changed in v10, so changing it again could be confusing, so I agree with your position. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
