On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 7:25 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > I think it does the contrary. The current mechanism is, in my opinion, > downright dangerous: > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20160201235854.go8...@awork2.anarazel.de
A sort of middle way would be to keep the secondary checkpoint around but never try to replay from that point, or only if a specific flag is provided. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
