On 11/6/17 16:27, Simon Riggs wrote: > You mention PARALLEL SAFE is not used for procedures. Isn't it an > architectural restriction that procedures would not be able to execute > in parallel? (At least this year)
I'm not sure what you are referring to here. I don't think the functionality I'm proposing does anything in parallel or has any interaction with it. > I think we need an explanatory section of the docs, but there doesn't > seem to be one for Functions, so there is no place to add some text > that says the above. > > I found it confusing that ALTER and DROP ROUTINE exists but not CREATE > ROUTINE. At very least we should say somewhere "there is no CREATE > ROUTINE", so its absence is clearly intentional. I did wonder whether > we should have it as well, but its just one less thing to review, so > good. I'll look for a place to add some documentation around this. > Was surprised that pg_dump didn't use DROP ROUTINE, when appropriate. It's not clear to me why that would be preferred. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
