Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Should we create some user-friendly macros for the error field codes? I
> have a feeling that PGXYZ_SQLSTATE may make for better code than just 'C'.
I just pushed the ERRCODE_ macros out into their own file. How about
placing that file where client apps can include it directly?
Note though that I think client apps will want to test "is this code in
this class" about as often as they'll want to check for specific
codes. We might need to provide some additional infrastructure to
handle that.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
