Tom Lane wrote:
> We need to think about whether this bug is serious enough to justify a
> quick 7.3.5 release.  I'm leaning to the idea that it is not, because
> if it were, we'd have heard about it from the field before now.  In
> pre-7.4 code there is only one instant in the lifespan of an index where
> the bug could occur, and then only if the index is created empty.

Agreed, I don't think 7.3.5 is warranted, but it would have been nice to
get this in 7.3.4.  Let's keep our eyes open for maybe a 7.3.5 later.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
    (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Reply via email to