"Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I see other strdup() calls that don't check on a return. Should we deal
> > with those too?
>
> strdup -> xstrdup if you're concerned.
May be is a good idea avoid the future use:
#define strdup STRDUP_DEPRECATED_USE_INSTEAD_XSTRDUP
I don't like the other solution: redefine the strdup in function of xstrdup.
Regards
Gaetano Mendola
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
