Bruce Momjian writes: > Right. We can't assume because a *_r function is missing that the > normal function is thread-safe.
I recon i'll get blue in the face before long, and one of you guys will fly over to Scotland to give me a good kicking!... But'll say it again anyway... That's not our concern - if the OS isn't thread safe we can't do anything about it, and to worry about it is an enormous waste of development time. Who do you think is interested in a thread-safe libpq on a non-thread-safe OS? L. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
