On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> > column? I think MAX() does not know or cares if a column is indexed, but...
>
> No. Postgresql uses MVCC which mean there could be multiple views of sample
> tuple active at the same time. There is no way to tell which is max. value for
> a column as definition of a committed value can be a moving target.
>
> It can not be cached, at least easily. That's the price to pay for MVCC. Same
> goes for select count(*) from table. That query has to end up with a sequential
> scan.
It does not have to be like that. Even with a mvcc database it can use the
index for max/min and in my opinion it should.
As far as I know the only reason why it's not implemented in postgresql is
because pg has a general aggregate model and max/min are implemented using
that. Still, max/min are special in that they are almost the only
aggregates that can use an index to deliver the result directly. Some day
someone should make max/min a special case in pg. Exactly how is the
question.
I don't know mssql much, but I guess you can't define your own aggregate
functions there? Then all aggregate functions are special anyway.
--
/Dennis
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
