"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> If we force people to give a --without-spinlocks config option to build >> that way, then `pg_config --configure' will reveal the dirty deed ...
> That's not quite what I meant :) Right now, if I understood what Bruce > was saying, if someone doesn't have spinlocks, it switches to using SysV > Messenging, correct? In the current system, is there anything that one > can do on a running, live system, to detect that you aren't using > spinlocks? It'll be fairly obvious if you use "ipcs -s" and count up the number of semaphores created by the postmaster. Ordinarily we will grab approximately max_connections semas, but without spinlocks it will be somewhere north of max_connections + 2 * shared_buffers ... regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]