On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" wrote: > > > > On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Hiroshi Inoue wrote: > > > > > He also ignored my question about "2 phase commit" in pgsql-hackers, for > > > example. > > > > Actually, I've been following that thread pretty closely, and I believe I > > missed your question :( > > OK I would explain it again. > > Bruced asked. > > > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Tom Lane wrote: > >>> You're not considering the possibility of a transient communication > >>> failure. > > >> Can't the master re-send the request after a timeout? > > Tom's answer was. > > > Not "it can", but "it has to". > > IMHO the partcipants(masters) don't have to bear such > heavy responsibility. My answer is > > Yes "it can", but "it doesn't have to". > > Of cource, the cooridnater(slave) has the responsibility > to retry the commit operation for the in-doubt transaction. 'k, a statement, not a question, which is why it didn't stick with me as being unanswered :( ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings