A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dawn M. Wolthuis) wrote:
> Good question. Although I would want to move away from relational
> databases too, if there is an RDBMS and one wants to query it, what
> would I aim for? If you look at XQuery, you will see an example of
> what I would definitely NOT aim for. Although the user of such a
> language might very well be a technical person, instead of starting
> with mathematics (relational calculus, relational algebra) I would
> suggest starting with language. The mathematics of language is more
> complex than the mathematics of relations, particularly simple
> relations (such as 1NF tables).
No, that _very much_ gets things backwards.
You need to have a clearly defined model of how the data is to be
manipulated before it makes any sense to try to make up a language.
--
output = reverse("moc.enworbbc" "@" "enworbbc")
http://cbbrowne.com/info/rdbms.html
To iterate is human; to recurse, divine.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match
