Christopher Kings-Lynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there _any_ way of sorting by a regproc as it appears, not as its
> underlying OID?
Can't think of one. If we supported casting regproc to text then I'd
expect ordering by the regproc-casted-to-text to do what you want.
But we don't.
There have been some questions in the past about why we don't support
casting *every* datatype to and from text (using the datatype's input
and output functions if necessary). I'm on record as not favoring
allowing such conversions to happen implicitly, but I can't see any
good reason not to allow them as explicit casts...
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
