Christopher Browne kirjutas E, 03.11.2003 kell 02:15: > Well, actually, the case where it _would_ be troublesome would be > where there was a combination of huge tables needing vacuuming and > smaller ones that are _heavily_ updated (e.g. - account balances), > where pg_autovacuum might take so long on some big tables that it > wouldn't get to the smaller ones often enough.
Can't one just run a _separate_ VACUUM on those smaller tables ? ------------ Hannu ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
