On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier writes:
>
> > As Tom announced on Friday, Release Candidate 1 has now been tag'd and
> > bundled ...
>
> Can you please sometime decide once and for all how you're going to name
> the tarballs and then communicate that information to the group? Is it
> rc1 or RC1, beta2 or b2? It's not that there is a technical problem with
> any of these choices, but the amount of randomness in this process just
> scares me with every new release you make.
Why does it scare you? *raised eyebrow*
As for beta, I used 'beta#' throughout this release cycle, and will use
RC# for the release candidate(s) ...
> > please test to confirm that nothing seems off with this build
>
> The tarball contains a file doc/man-7.4.tar.gz, but the makefiles expect
> to see a file doc/man.tar.gz.
k, am re-generating with the change in place ...
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match
