Barry Lind wrote: > > > Tom Lane wrote: > > > >>Using tableoid instead of tablename avoids renaming problems, but makes > >>the names horribly opaque IMNSHO. > > > > > > Agreed. I think using the OIDs would be a horrible choice. > > > > As a point of reference Oracle uses a naming convention of 'Cnnnn' where > nnnn is a sequence generated unique value. So in Oracle system > generated names are very opaque. I never saw this as a problem, since > if you wanted a non-opaque name you could always assign one yourself.
What, no dollar signs? :-) -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
