Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Dennis Bjorklund writes: >> I'm in the middle of implementing function parameter names.
> So these two reasons make a "namevector" impractical: First, it would > probably not be in the performance critical path. Second, it would use up > a fixed length of NAMEDATALEN * FUNC_MAX_ARGS (currently 1024 bytes) in > every pg_proc row. In this case, a regular name[] would be more suitable. > Just be sure to put it after all the fixed-length fields. Actually I'd suggest text[], as there is no good reason to pad the array entries to a fixed length. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]