Christopher Kings-Lynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there demand for this syntax:
>
> ALTER SEQUENCE ON table(col) CYCLE 100;
What if the values in a column are generated via a sequence that was
created independently -- i.e. it's not a SERIAL column?
I'm not very enthusiastic about features that assume a one-to-one
mapping between sequences and columns; in general, the mapping is
many-to-many.
-Neil
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
