Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is a backwards-compatibility hangover.

> But I'd not want to break it just because someone thinks the hack is
> ugly.  It was ugly from day one.

I agree it shouldn't be removed -- I was just curious to see what was
using it. It's certainly ugly, though.

I'll submit a patch documenting this.

-Neil


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to