Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This is a backwards-compatibility hangover.
> But I'd not want to break it just because someone thinks the hack is > ugly. It was ugly from day one. I agree it shouldn't be removed -- I was just curious to see what was using it. It's certainly ugly, though. I'll submit a patch documenting this. -Neil ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster