Hi Tom,
At last I have a much better trace for the vacuum full bug.
Can some one help me on this one?
Image mémoire de postmaster (processus p1) créée
FICHIER IMAGE MEMOIRE [swapn dans qsort.c]
11 (segv code[SEGV_MAPERR] address[0x8420000]) SIGNALE dans p1
0xbffae03f (swapn+47:) movl (%esi),%eax
debug> Suivi de pile correspondant à p1, Programme postmaster
*[0] swapn(0x2, 0x831b758, 0x831b770) [0xbffae03f]
[1] qst(0x80448cc, 0x831b758, 0x831b788) [0xbffadca2]
[2] qsort(0x831b758, 0x18, 0x2, 0x80eb9f8) [0xbffae17f]
[3] repair_frag(vacrelstats=0x83122bc, onerel=0x82cf56c, vacuum_pages=0x8046a64,
fraged_pages=0x8046a54, nindexes=1, Irel=0x83672e0) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[4] full_vacuum_rel(onerel=0x82cf56c, vacstmt=0x83104b4) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[5] vacuum_rel(relid=16408, vacstmt=0x83104b4, expected_relkind=114 (or 'r')) [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
[6] vacuum(vacstmt=0x83104b4) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[7] ProcessUtility(parsetree=0x83104b4, dest=Remote, completionTag="") [EMAIL
PROTECTED]@713]
[8] pg_exec_query_string(query_string=0x831020c, dest=Remote,
parse_context=0x830e204) [EMAIL PROTECTED]@789]
[9] PostgresMain(argc=4, argv=0x8046d78, username="ohp") [EMAIL PROTECTED]@2013]
[10] DoBackend(port=0x829e500) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[11] BackendStartup(port=0x829e500) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[12] ServerLoop( présumé: 0x1, 0x8297af8, 0x1) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[13] PostmasterMain(argc=1, argv=0x8297af8) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[14] main(argc=1, argv=0x8047c44, 0x8047c4c) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[15] _start() [0x806ad1c]
debug>
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 14:03:42 -0500
> From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: pgsql-hackers list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 73.5 and uw 713
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > I've upgraded my system from 7.3.4 to 7.3.5 yesterday and have already
> > experienced to crash during vacuum full.
> > I have'nt recompiled with debug yet but it's a sigsegv in function
> > repair_frag in vacuum.c
>
> Considering that vacuum.c hasn't changed in that branch since 7.3beta4,
> it's highly unlikely that this represents a regression between 7.3.4 and
> 7.3.5. Pre-existing bug, maybe ...
>
> regards, tom lane
>
--
Olivier PRENANT Tel: +33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work)
6, Chemin d'Harraud Turrou +33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax)
31190 AUTERIVE +33-6-07-63-80-64 (GSM)
FRANCE Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Make your life a dream, make your dream a reality. (St Exupery)
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match
