Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> Oh, okay. I would not object to suppressing pg_temp_NNN schemas from > >> the \dn display. That isn't what this patch does, however. > > > OK. I read the TODO and it says only: > > * Have psql \dn show only visible schemas using current_schemas() > > That TODO was your interpretation of the discussion; I'm not sure anyone > else bought into it. > > > so that's what I did, but I think now I have to add a test so only > > non-visible temp schemas are suppressed, > > You are complicating something that could be simple. Why not just > suppress schemas named 'pg_temp_XXX', period? I don't see any strong > reason to display them, whether they are your own backend's temp schema > or not. Arguably, the fact that temp tables are kept in a special > schema is an implementation detail that most people won't care about. > And there is no data that \dn can show that is really important for temp > schemas. The owner column is at best misleading...
OK, unless someone objects, I will head in that direction. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
