"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > if you think about it, the "postmaster" is actually aptly named, > since it is the process that sorts out the incoming connections and > assigns them to backend processes ... just like the postmaster does > with your mail ...
Right, hence the witty pun :-) IMHO this whole debate is largely academic: it really wouldn't be practical to start renaming components at this point, whether they are perfectly named or not. -Neil ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
