Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In this way, no one ever has the rename file open while we are holding
> the locks, and we can loop without holding an exclusive lock on
> pg_shadow, and file writes remain in order.

You're doing this where exactly, and are certain that you are holding no
locks why exactly?  And if you aren't holding a lock, what prevents
concurrency bugs?

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
      joining column's datatypes do not match

Reply via email to