Tom Lane wrote: > The best idea I've heard so far is the one about sync() followed by > a bunch of fsync()s. That seems to be correct, efficient, and dependent > only on very-long-established Unix semantics.
Agreed. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
