Hey Bruce, I never saw the patch hit the hackers list. Did any of you smart folks take a look at it?
Cheers, Rob When grilled further on (Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:58:02 -0500 (EST)), Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> confessed: > > Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at: > > http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches > > I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > Robert Creager wrote: > -- Start of PGP signed section. > > > > Per a brief conversation with Tom, I've created a patch for adding support > > for'week' within the date_trunc function. > > > > Within the patch I added a couple of test cases and associated target > > output, and changed the documentation to add 'week' appropriately. > > > > Comments? Should I of bypassed this list and subscribed/posted to the patch > > list? > > > > Cheers, > > Rob > > > > -- > > 17:07:39 up 15 days, 46 min, 4 users, load average: 2.18, 2.23, 2.27 > > Linux 2.4.21-0.13_test #60 SMP Sun Dec 7 17:00:02 MST 2003 > > [ Attachment, skipping... ] > -- End of PGP section, PGP failed! > > -- > Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us > [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 > + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road > + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 > -- 20:21:06 up 18 days, 3:59, 2 users, load average: 1.52, 1.31, 1.25 Linux 2.4.21-0.13_test #60 SMP Sun Dec 7 17:00:02 MST 2003 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
