> > (2) Does someone has any comment about these problems or > > the way I intend to try to address them? > > About the implementation idea with hints. I'm not sure will be so easy to > implement as you suggested. Maybe if one add hints to every construct, > and set to empty hint where it does not make sense.
Sure. > What I'm afraid of is to get hints or advices that are plain wrong. > CREATE TABLE foo (bar int key); > HINT: table name expected > or something. Sure, I agree with you. > But if it works good in practice, why not having hints. I agree that the actual validation is whether the result looks good, and are most of the time useful. > stmt: CREATE TABLE ( anything ); { generate error "missing table name" } Yes, that's an idea, but it would change the syntax definition, and may create conflicts, so it's an harder way to do it. -- Fabien Coelho - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings