On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 01:16:51PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I agree a renaming of list functions is good. If we had kept the
> original Berkeley code as-is, we would have a lot fewer developers
> today. :-) Making drastic cleanups is often worthwile. I write
> backend code and still can't remember which list function does what, so
> clearer naming would help me a lot, and I am sure others too.
Maybe I already ask, is there any coding style recommendation for _new_
written things?
I agree with Bruce. The list functions and a lot of other functions
can be candidates for rename. I read Mono docs last night and
it's perfect if they can write to docs about functions names:
"mono_<type>_<action>".
I think sometime are people too much focus on the shortest way to
target and forgot that with code work others people and not CPU only.
(sorry of this pontification:-)
Karel
--
Karel Zak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://home.zf.jcu.cz/~zakkr/
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
