Tom Lane wrote:
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hans-J=FCrgen_Sch=F6nig?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Nested transactions: I don't think nested transactions will really help to resolve the core problem. Committing a subtransaction will most likely not imply that a parent transaction can be committed as well.


Agreed.


As I said: Some people MIGHT find it useful in some special cases.
If the community decides that it does not enough sense to integrate it into contrib I can live with that.


I won't take a position on whether it's useful enough to put in contrib,
but if people want it there, I'd just ask that the README be extended to
point out the transactional risks.

this should not be a problem. I can intregrate all necessary information there.

folks, let's do a poll ...
who is for it - who is against it ...

regards,

Hans


-- Cybertec Geschwinde u Schoenig Schoengrabern 134, A-2020 Hollabrunn, Austria Tel: +43/2952/30706 or +43/664/233 90 75 www.cybertec.at, www.postgresql.at, kernel.cybertec.at



---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to