Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > >>Now, I have to change that relation_expr to qualified_name. However, > >>this causes shift/reduce errors. (Due to ALTER TABLE relation_expr SET > >>WITHOUT OIDS.) > > > > Well, seems like what you have to do is leave it as relation_expr > > as far as bison is concerned, but test in the C-code action and error > > out if "*" was specified. (Accepting ONLY seems alright to me.) > > Actually, it occurs to me that the SET WITHOUT CLUSTER form CAN recurse. > Should I make it do that, even though the CLUSTER ON form cannot?
I just thought about this. CLUSTER is more of a storage-level specification, rather than a logical one. Seems it is OK that WITOUTH CLUSTER not recurse into inherited tables, especially since the CLUSTER command does not. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
