-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Dave Page wrote: |>-----Original Message----- |>From: Gaetano Mendola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |>Sent: 17 May 2004 16:02 |>To: Bruno Wolff III |>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |>Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Email data type |> |>About the domain literals, I think to validate it in the near |>future, rejecting private subnet according to this list: |> |>10.0.0.0 - 10.255.255.255 |>172.16.0.0 - 172.31.255.255 |>192.168.0.0 - 192.168.255.255 |>169.254.0.0 -169.254.255.255 | | | Why? What's wrong with private addresses?
Well I think that accept an email like:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
is a risky.
It's true that any RFC forbid this kind of emails, so I can accept it and leave to the final user the opportunity to extract the domain an validate it.
Regards Gaetano Mendola
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFAqOHm7UpzwH2SGd4RAp4dAJwNqDSws1cVwKr/QMXG/JvV/8M94QCbBfIS alixKQYe/VoLpwXrBFHszDs= =BAML -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
