Jan Wieck wrote: > > I am still wondering about two things: > > Somebody has posted a 2PC patch - I haven't seen too many comments > > Somebody has posted sync multimaster replication (PgCluster) - nobody > > has commented on that. Maybe I am the only one who has ever tried it ... > > Do you really need someone "commenting" on query based replication? I > get goosebumps from just thinking someone would voluntarily push all > sequence- or timestamp-generation and other not strictly deterministic > functionality into the application to be able to use such a "solution". > This is exactly how people work around all the MySQL idiosyncrasies. > > > > > Most likely this is not very encourageing for the developers involved ... > > Most hopefully this is very discouraging! Connection pools are a nice > thing and I have used pgpool recently with great success, for pooling > connections. But attempting to deliver multimaster replication as a > byproduct of a connection pool isn't going to become an enterprise > feature. And the more half-baked, half-functional and half-reliable > replication attempts there are, the harder it will be to finally get a > real solution being recognized.
Well, considering we offer _nothing_ for multi-master right now, I think it is a valuable project. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
