On 12 Feb 2004, Greg Stark wrote: > Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Hmmm ... maybe query_work_mem and maintenance_work_mem, or something > > > similar? > > > > I'll go with these unless someone has another proposal ... > > dml_sort_mem and ddl_sort_mem ?
I like those. Are they an accurte representation of what's going on? If so, I'd go with these, as they are more easily recognizable by folks who've worked with dbs for a while. On the other hand, they're probably less recognizable to the newbies. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match