Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> This is exactly the same argument as not being able to overwrite cmin.
> Basically the phantom xid's are a shorthand for saying the tuple was
> created by xid1 and deleted by xid2, both part of the same main
> transaction.
> A cursor looking at the rows has to recognize the xid is a phantom (via
> pg_subtrans) and look up the creation xid.
You still don't see the point. Consider
BEGIN;
DECLARE CURSOR c1 FOR SELECT * FROM a ...;
INSERT INTO a VALUES(...); -- call this row x
DECLARE CURSOR c2 FOR SELECT * FROM a ...;
BEGIN;
DELETE FROM a WHERE ...; -- assume this deletes row x
ROLLBACK;
FETCH FROM c1; -- must NOT see row x
FETCH FROM c2; -- must see row x
AFAICS your proposal does not support this. The two cursors' snapshots
will differ only in the recorded current-cid for the outer transaction.
If the subtrans has overwritten xmin/cmin, there is no way to make that
decision correctly.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
