Jan Wieck wrote:
> On 6/9/2004 1:44 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> > Jan Wieck wrote:
> >> On 6/9/2004 1:04 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> 
> >> > What we really need is a way to do the uid->username mapping in a
> >> > thread-safe way.  Could we check the environment for $USER or $LOGNAME?
> >> > Could we require them to be set for thread builds on OS's without
> >> > getpwuid_r and in cases where the username is not specified in the
> >> > connection string?
> >> 
> >> Maybe not as popular, but what about breaking backward compatibility and 
> >> require the DB name to be specified, no username fallback? How many 
> >> applications really rely on that feature? And people who are used to it 
> >> from the commandline can set PGDATABASE in their .profile to get it back.
> > 
> > That is only part of where the username is used. I assume it is also
> > used for connections when the username isn't supplied, not just as the
> > default for the database name.
> > 
> > Basically on those platforms, either the username would have to be in
> > the environment, or supplied as part of the connection string.
> > 
> 
> We have PGUSER, PGHOST, PGPORT, PGDATABASE, all of them you can set in 
> your .profile, why do we need to lookup the uid at all?

In case they don't set it, which is very common, I am sure.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

               http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html

Reply via email to