[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > Where are we on this? > > That's a good question. > > Tom doesn't like the syntax of "include" and there are a couple bugs he is > concered it. > > I'm pretty agnostic about the syntax, but I wouldn't get overly worried > about the metaphor presented either. > > "include='...'" doesn't bother me at all, but some people have a problem > with it. > > Then there is the design of using a callable function for a configuration > parameter, personally, I think this feature is useful for the future, Tom > seems to have a problem it it. > > After that, the discussion sort of ends. > > > I'm willing to adress the bugs. > I don't think the syntax is a huge deal, IMHO at most it is a > documentation problem.
Well, it seems pretty clear were we need to go on this. First, we could just add the documentation to the non-include part of the patch based on the version I posted and apply that to be sure it gets into 7.5. Then, for "include", it needs to be an operation and not a variable, probably something in guc-file.l. It should not use an equals and not be something you can say SHOW with. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
