Christopher Kings-Lynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> 2) pg_restore needs to be more tolerant with certain kinds of errors.

> Hmmm, dunno about this - it wasn't on my radar really.  I'll experiment 
> with it, but I don't think I'm going to have time before June 30th :(

I think we dealt with this already: pg_restore has been taught that the
correct response to a SQL command error is to report it and forge ahead,
not curl up and die.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Reply via email to