Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It has been suggested a couple of times that we should use a different > syntax for subtransactions than for main transactions. This would for > example allow things like > > > BEGIN; > do something; > SUBBEGIN;
It might be awkward for clients like psql that will want to execute every command in a nested transaction. It would mean they would have to know whether the user has started a transaction or not in order to know whether to use "BEGIN" or "SUBBEGIN". But I guess they would have to do that anyways unless there's some protocol level way to indicate a query should be executed in a nested transaction. -- greg ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
