Tom Lane wrote: > I thought about restricting the scope of the TZ testing to start in 1990 > or so to avoid this, but that seems certain to fall foul of the other > problem, which is distinguishing closely-related timezones (cf Chris > K-L discovering that he lives in Antarctica, a few days back...) > > Maybe the whole match-on-behavior approach is wrong and we need to do > something else, but I'm really unsure what. Ideas?
I threw out the matching idea to Magnus as a crazy idea, and I am surprised we ended up actually using it, but I can't think of a less crazy idea either. If we can't find a timezone match should we start looking only from +1990? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
