Andreas Pflug wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Andreas Pflug wrote: > > > Right. We already have to use shared mem for the backends and > > postmaster. It is the logger we are worried about. > > > > Tom brought up the point that if the logger used shared memory, we would > > have to kill/restart it if we need to reinitialize shared memory, > > I don't know why that particular segment should ever be renewed. Anyway, > it's gone.
As I remember, we have one big shared memory segment. Where you creating a special one just for this timestamp? If you were, I see why your approach was safer, but as you said, it doesn't buy us much anyway. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
