Oliver Elphick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How about adding a logging option to put the transaction id on the log
> for every statement that modifies the database? Would that be a small
> enough change to be allowed into 8.0?
I think we could get away with adding transaction ID as one of the
available %-items in log_line_prefix. I'm not sure how useful this
really is though --- timestamps are probably more useful overall to
have in your log. The direction I was expecting we'd head in is to
provide WAL logfile examination tools.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
