Tom Lane wrote: > I haven't seen any particular reason why we should adopt another SCM. > Perhaps BitKeeper or SubVersion would be better for our purposes than > CVS, but are they enough better to justify the switchover costs?
BitKeeper ist not open source, so it's out of the question for most people. Subversion is shockingly unstable. I'm very open for something that replaces CVS, but I'd rather not use any than one of these two. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
