Tom Lane wrote:
> Gaetano Mendola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
>>
>>>./configure --enable-debug
>
>
>>Is this enough? I'm seeing that with --enable-debug only the
>>option -g is passed to the compiler and the option -O2 is
>>still there, is it not better compile with -O0 if you are
>>going to debug it?
>
>
> If you want to single-step through the code a lot, then -O0 is good.
> But are you really gonna do that so much? I do most of my tracing
> at the level of function calls.
Of course not, but given that I don't know nothing I guess at the
beginning in order to see what is going on and understand how the code
work I need to "inspect" some variables some times.
> I tend to use -O1 as a compromise setting --- the code isn't totally
> scrambled but it doesn't run like a dog either. (Also, for development
> purposes, -O0 is evil because it disables certain useful warnings in
> gcc.)
Thank you for the advice.
Regards
Gaetano Mendola
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
