Reini Urban wrote:
Bruce Momjian schrieb:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
There are alot of windows.h includes:
... and most of them are redundant because it is already included via c.h.
Right, but we only include windows.h in Mingw. Does Cygwin need it?
Not really, but it will be lot of new work, which is imho not worth it.
In some places the cygwin section calls WinAPI functions. It could be worked around by using the posix/cygwin counterparts.
pgsymlink for example.
I'm quite certain we can avoid the problem if we are careful. But wouldn't it be better to get rid of the problem instead by using some other marker?
cheers
andrew
---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
