Tom Lane wrote: > The main thing that I'm not happy about is the syntax. I'm going to > resist commandeering => for this purpose, and I don't see any way to > use that symbol for this without forbidding it as a user-defined > operator. I previously suggested using AS, which is already a fully > reserved word, but that suggestion seems not to have garnered any > support.
As previously mentioned, AS is already used by the SQL standard for a different purpose in this context. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
