On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 07:10:35PM +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote a few months ago: > > >PostgreSQL's behavior on these cases is poor. I don't think anyone > >who has tried to use PG for this sort of thing will disagree, and > >yes it is getting better. Does anyone else consider this to be a > >problem? If so, I'm open for suggestions on what can be done. > >I've suggested a number of things, and admittedly they have all > >been pretty weak ideas, but they were potentially workable. > > > What about a dblink style interface to a non-MVCC SQL database? I > think someone on this list mentioned that there are open source > in-memory SQL databases.
Funny you should mention this. I'm working on a generalized one that uses PL/PerlU at http://fetter.org/pg_ps/ Thanks to Josh Berkus for design ideas & implementation roadmap, and to Josh Drake, Andrew Dunstan, Abhijit Menon-Sen and (of course) Tom Lane for the infrastructure that makes this doable. :) Cheers, D -- David Fetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://fetter.org/ phone: +1 510 893 6100 mobile: +1 415 235 3778 Remember to vote! ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
