Right. From a bare-functionality point of view there's nothing wrong with it, it just seems inconsistent and therefore likely to trip someone up in future.
But it seems no one else cares, so I'll shut up about it ...
I'm happy to have it fixed or changed :) I was just pointing out why it was like it is. It uses two different parsing functions.
Chris
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
