> Dennis Bjorklund wrote: > > The named entity that is called a collation works for a character > > repertoire. It would need to handle different charsets for that > > repertoire of course. So there would be one collation called say > > ucs_sv and not utf8_sv, utf16_sv, utf32_sv. > > Again, theoretically, this might work, but I doubt that this is a > practical implementation. Moreover, since Unicode is more or less the > only chararacter repertoire that have more than one encoding in use, > and neither UTF-16 nor UTF-32 can be used inside the PostgreSQL server > (embedded zero bytes etc.), this is really a nonissue.
I agree with Peter. -- Tatsuo Ishii ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
