Markus Bertheau wrote:
Ð ÐÑÐ, 05.11.2004, Ð 21:40, Heikki Linnakangas ÐÐÑÐÑ:
On Fri, 5 Nov 2004, Travis P wrote:
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:BDB.
Interestingly, the subversion repository is 585MB, and the CVS repository
is only 260MB,
BDB or FSFS back-end? FSFS seems to require less space. (The BDB backend tends to pre-allocate space though, so maybe there was a big jump, but then growth will slow markedly, so making a comparison for a repository that will continue to grow is difficult.)
Here's what the subversion book has to say about that:
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/svnbook-1.1/ch05.html#svn-ch-5-sect-1.2.A
We use svn over ssh and recently switched to fsfs because of the umask
problem and because read-only access to bdb causes writes to the
database.
This just reinforces Tom's well-made point about maturity/stability. I rejected using SVN on another project a few months ago for just this sort of reason.
cheers
andrew
---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
